<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 65 tonight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uncontrolledvocabulary.com/2008/12/10/episode-65-tonight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uncontrolledvocabulary.com/2008/12/10/episode-65-tonight/</link>
	<description>A weekly live interactive roundtable discussion of all things library, every Wednesday at 10 PM Eastern</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:28:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://uncontrolledvocabulary.com/2008/12/10/episode-65-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncontrolledvocabulary.com/?p=351#comment-565</guid>
		<description>This comment was left by Jill Hurst-Wahl, but was lost in a server transition:

Very interesting about the LITA unconference.  The fee seems quite high and I hope they justify it.  While it is acceptable to charge, the idea is not to be obsessive, but to recoup necessary costs.  For the Library Camp@Syracuse, two organizations used grant money to pay for space.  The registration fee paid for food.  People appreciated the low cost. (http://cnylibrarycamp.wetpaint.com)

I&#039;ve noticed that most library unconferences follow the same model. Scott Berkun has outlines several models that can be used and I hope we (library workers) begin to use a broader variety for our events. (http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2006/how-to-run-a-great-unconference-session/)

Finally, there has been talk in FriendFeed about whether an unconference can/should be a national event or if regional is better.  It seems to me that a lot of the cost savings can be wiped out when you add in extensive travel.  Perhaps &quot;national&quot; topical discussions are something that could be held as TalkShoe events?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment was left by Jill Hurst-Wahl, but was lost in a server transition:</p>
<p>Very interesting about the LITA unconference.  The fee seems quite high and I hope they justify it.  While it is acceptable to charge, the idea is not to be obsessive, but to recoup necessary costs.  For the Library Camp@Syracuse, two organizations used grant money to pay for space.  The registration fee paid for food.  People appreciated the low cost. (<a href="http://cnylibrarycamp.wetpaint.com" rel="nofollow">http://cnylibrarycamp.wetpaint.com</a>)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that most library unconferences follow the same model. Scott Berkun has outlines several models that can be used and I hope we (library workers) begin to use a broader variety for our events. (<a href="http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2006/how-to-run-a-great-unconference-session/" rel="nofollow">http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2006/how-to-run-a-great-unconference-session/</a>)</p>
<p>Finally, there has been talk in FriendFeed about whether an unconference can/should be a national event or if regional is better.  It seems to me that a lot of the cost savings can be wiped out when you add in extensive travel.  Perhaps &#8220;national&#8221; topical discussions are something that could be held as TalkShoe events?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

