<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uncontrolled Vocabulary #2 &#8211; Similarly, Horribly Aghast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uncontrolledvocabulary.com/2007/07/05/uncontrolled-vocabulary-2-similarly-horribly-aghast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uncontrolledvocabulary.com/2007/07/05/uncontrolled-vocabulary-2-similarly-horribly-aghast/</link>
	<description>A weekly live interactive roundtable discussion of all things library, every Wednesday at 10 PM Eastern</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:28:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie</title>
		<link>http://uncontrolledvocabulary.com/2007/07/05/uncontrolled-vocabulary-2-similarly-horribly-aghast/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncontrolledvocabulary.com/2007/07/05/uncontrolled-vocabulary-2-similarly-horribly-aghast/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Fantastic discussion, folks!  I especially found the discussion about how we are jerks for making patrons learn how to use Dewey particularly thought-provoking.  I work in a specialized library which uses a modified version of part of LC (not Dewey).  I walked out into my little library after listening to that part and was horrified to be greeted by signs with a tangle of numbers, not subjects!  Perhaps it is time to re-think that.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;d be interested in a future discussion of how we would re-build the OPAC &quot;from the ground up.&quot;  Can we give this a collective vision? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cheers,&lt;br/&gt;Connie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic discussion, folks!  I especially found the discussion about how we are jerks for making patrons learn how to use Dewey particularly thought-provoking.  I work in a specialized library which uses a modified version of part of LC (not Dewey).  I walked out into my little library after listening to that part and was horrified to be greeted by signs with a tangle of numbers, not subjects!  Perhaps it is time to re-think that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in a future discussion of how we would re-build the OPAC &#8220;from the ground up.&#8221;  Can we give this a collective vision? </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />Connie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

